Warzone

Reviews

Review by Daryle on 4/1/2017.

Fun Map nowhere to get cornered so the game flows smoothly to the end

17 out of 17 people found this review helpful.

Review by

krunx

on 4/8/2017.

Through my eyes the map is balanced very nice. There are no really overpowered regions and if you add wastelands or random warlord distribution you should face a completly different board situation every game. The map has a good amount of territories to play on it so the game wont last ages and on the other hand there are enough ways to seperate good from bad players. All in all, the map offers a solid basis for a good templates.

11 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

Review by Nathan

on 3/31/2017.

Solid little map. There are a couple of territories that aren't part of any primary bonus - just a superbonus. I never like that unless there is a very solid reason for it, but it's a minor point here that doesn't really detract from gameplay.

13 out of 16 people found this review helpful.

Review by

ZeroBlindDragon

on 4/9/2017.

I'm very excited about the future of this map!

The most beautiful thing about Concordia is that there are so many different ways to play it. I've tried a template similar to the one on the 1v1 Ladder, a template involving Full Limited Distribution (think Africa Elitism), a template with multi-attack turned on, a 2v2 template, a 3v3 template and a 4 players free-for-all! All of them provided fun, balanced, challenging and intense games.

The map may seem small, but it has more bonuses with a good ratio of income per territory than Modified Middle Earth or Battle Islands V. I adore choke points and Concordia has plenty of them! Wastelands drastically change the map so that not a single game looks similar to the other.

11 out of 13 people found this review helpful.

Review by Chessmat on 4/7/2017.

nice maps :)

7 out of 8 people found this review helpful.

Review by

Master Cowboy

on 4/11/2017.

Rather balanced map, looks nice and plays well. Overall it plays like any standard strategy map, but that's not a bad thing! If you enjoy 1v1's or small team games I highly recommend it!

6 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

Review by King Crimson on 8/11/2020.

I'm sure some people have beat this on single player. I'm a very good single player versus AI but when my bonuses are cut in half and the AI stuffs 30+ units on me every turn there is no way I can see to win. While I am trying to break its bonuses it loads up defense plus has units to take out me in other place. BS, BS, BS..... Give people a snowball's chance at least.

5 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

Review by

Zev

on 4/30/2017.

this map is really really nice :)

4 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

Review by

no_light on 4/23/2017.

nice one

3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

Review by ZaZa The 🐧 on 5/15/2017.

Great map, mainly good for 2-4 players, although by 4 players it can get messy. The way that the map goes from one side to the other may be hard for some people, but i really like it. 4/5

2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

Review by Mongo on 7/10/2022.

map is fine. Game "The Concordia Duel" isn't winnable due to the AI gets a sanctions card at turn 5, which puts your income at 50 % for the rest of the game.

2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

Review by

INSIDE

on 6/5/2017.

good map

1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

Review by Mitigator on 2/23/2021.

Map layout is pretty good with lots of single and multiple attack corridors allowing for surprise blocks and counter-attacks, however, against AI, you will only win if you find the one particular strategy that will allow you to win, AND if you coincidentally happen to employ that strategy when the AI employs one specific opening strategy. All other approaches appear impossible. Good luck!

My two cents is that the AI sanctions card is employed one turn too early to make it enjoyable for the average player. I don't think most will make the attempt more than 10 times to find a solution, which in most cases, it will require (IMYHO).