How would this change the legend rankings? 2v2s and 3v3s are easy to win if the team is stacked. They are easy to lose if the teammate makes a mistake too. Why count team games the same as 1v1s, which are harder to win in a tournament against good competition?
Wouldn't the above point system make the legend status of 4 points more meaningful?
WGL Live Events: Week #46 (Fizzer giving away free points....for the winners!): 8/2/2013 17:30:37
giving a 2v2 2 points and a 3v3 3 points for the winning team makes them more important in the current system.
all i am saying is try to approach the idea that 1 team equals 1 point (excluding alts). 1v1 = 1 point for the winning team. 2v2 = 1 point for the winning team.
i know you have vested interests gnuff, so you should dislike my idea. myhand, hhh, mala and timi have helped you get many wins to contend for the most legendaey legend of all time. a new way of interpreting your wins and you would probably have half as many points as hhh and timi.
WGL Live Events: Week #46 (Fizzer giving away free points....for the winners!): 8/2/2013 18:02:54