Well, obviously Germany would play a much bigger role, so that player would be in almost every game. Some of the other players may only be in a single match.

I can play as long as I am not one of the major players (USA/Germany/Russia/UK/Japan)

How would the mini games end? A time period? Or would someone have to win the game (eliminate everyone)? How would that work with major powers?

I would think you'd put a time period on it and whatever the battle lines are in that game, they transfer over to other ones?

lol thats the exact opposite of what i was about to say. I would like to join, as long as im a superpower, specificaly Germany or USA.

I'm trying to think of better ways to work this perhaps there should be 3 to 4 players for a superpower so that your not in every game.

And perhaps 20 turns or so intill it ends or less

With battles like Russia against Germany and Britain and USA against Germany and other major superpower battles would not happen intill the big game.

Sorry for another post but mylor your in thanks we will decide teams later thought

Another option:

Just get 10 people (or whatever the amount is) to play each side. Then assign those people parts in each game. You don't have to use the same amount each time (maybe a small battle just needs 3v3 and you grab 3 from each team.

Then you can assign portions of the large nations to each player. It would actually help battles and deployments be more realistic. If 1 person had all of Germany, they could place troops anywhere in the country instantly (on whatever map it is). Whereas if you had each person take a sub region, you could only deploy in that area. It would be a lot more realistic overall.

An example would be if you do battle in Africa (on the big Africa map), you could give 1 German person Algeria, 1 German person Libya, then give all the surrounding areas to UK players (however many you needed).

The question is do you even have all the maps you'd need for this? Is there a detailed enough Europe map?

And on that map I would just do giant wastelands behind the surrounding UK areas so you aren't playing on the whole map. If Germany takes all that is on the map, you can assume they would take rest of Africa after.

Or maybe you do greater Middle East map, I don't know. But it gives you more flexibility to just plug in however many people you need. Then you can also work around vacations easily since nobody is locked into a nation

That all sounds very good and will take that in to account thanks :)

i would play as Russia, Japan or China.

ALex, i happen to know a lot about history (especialy ww2) so i can help you with some of the battles, countries, etc.

Ok IVF thanks.

Mylor that would be great I know a lot about ww2 aswell i will start making the maps soon and they will be ready in November to December as there are a lot to do. Thanks mylor

ok im starting to make the maps for this game now im thinking of doing the poland game first

do you think i should use the very big poland 2.5k or the other big poland thats less territorys

also what fog level

Oh boy! What a marvelous idea. Count me in for sure!

i think you should use 2.5k poland.

I would always use as large as possible. you'd have a much more in depth battle and you can invite more players to partake in each side.

Your advances would be more realistic (rather than taking half a country in a turn or something).

If you need, you can increase the length of the game on that map if it is really large.

Year ok

thats very similar to my idea, though mine was more specific.
anyway, i'd be very interested in joining :)