I like Brain's idea. Also, Unreality could implement a "best of X" mode also, meaning that X games are played, for every lost game I lose $5 and for every won game I win $5. Moto***** if you're reading this I would like to challenge you to a best of 101. (I shall not reveal Moto*****'s full name due to privacy reasons).

@gror: Imagine a RR of 8 players. Thats not so big for a tourney. So each player plays 7 games. Every game is worth 5 dollars. So one person pays 35 dollars. then 35*8=280.

280 dollars. thats 7 memberships.
Person abandons account and buys a new account. Rest 240 dollars... gone with the wind!

not 20 dollars you derp.

my idea requires less transaction fee being paid to paypal.

loser to winner
instead of
loser to host to winner

Yea of coz a trustable host may work, but a group of trustable players could also work. The host can always pick contestants that is well trusted.


Despite there are a lot of trolls in this forum, there are also more than enough trustable players here.

@Pulsey - Care to go back to the first post and read the first point. Single Elimination. If, as Un has said, it starts off as a small tournament to test it out, I can imagine one of roughly 4 people and a host. tooenty dollah!

@Unreality - I do like the idea, but I think it would be unimplementable to the wider Warlight community. It would basically be limited to a group of people you know well enough to trust. However, if you do manage to get it off the ground I would like to participate ;)

Moto***** could accept Pulsius invitation. To be fair before each game you two hand out the US$ to me and i will distribute them rightfully

however, i dont see how Pulsius beat Feather****** in the long run ;( Opps I mean Moto*****

Single Elimination with 4 player means only 2 games to win to become champion.

2*5= 10

10 dollars, not 20 dollars derp!

Sze***** I mean Pulsius could beat Feather*******/Moto*****

p.s. Pulsius I dont mean to troll. It is just that people need to know that there could be top players playing with alt under radar. Contestants need to capable of taking risk when money is involved.

hehe we are both wrong. There are 3 games. 3 multiplied by 5 makes phiftien dollah!
Oops. I'm wrong again! Everyone who joined would have to put in 5 dollah, then the people through to the next round each put in another 5. Thurtee dollah!!!!

Edited 11/15/2013 11:49:47

Gror let me make it clearer:

step 1:
Contestants A,B,C,D all send US$ 1 to host, and host send the money back to each of them as verification

step 2: Single elimination, suppose A vs B, and C vs D

step 3: Suppose A won, player B then send A US$5
Suppose player D got killed in real life and C won, C accept no money and goes on.

Step 4: A vs C.
If A won then C will send A US$5
If C won then A will send C US$5

finished.

however, i dont see how Pulsius beat Feather****** in the long run ;( Opps I mean Moto*****

wait... unraelity you'v played pulsius before/you know who he is?

if Pulsius = Pulsey then yes I played him before. In fact Pulsey has helped many new players(e.g. me) to adapt the game

I am Pulsey.

-,-'

Edited 11/15/2013 12:10:07

opps, brain = pulsey? then i dont know about pulsius :)

All I know is I'm not moto*****

lets play a 1v1, been a while since i last talked to you

I see this as just profit to the host.

Suppose player D got killed in real life

Well, that escalated quickly...

@Un - Pulsey and I were deliberating about how much loot could be acquired by a crooked host, if they were trusted with the funds. We weren't talking about a transaction between contesting players. :)

at most US$1 dollar for the host.

Simply because the contestants should line up in transferring US$ 1 and wait for the host to send back the money