I don't think JV is an alt, he's played a decent amount of games with a realistic win and boot rate and doesn't look like he's trolling.
Warlighters will accept you if you keep it up and can be on every day or 2 at least. you also have to stay below 10% boot rate.
Invite me to a game if you're interested please :)

WFV - i think by alt they meant Lotus.. and by the way - take a look at p/r league thread.. you declined the tiebreaker

sorry for offtopic..

"lack Lotus....if you deem me such a bad player feel free to make a game.

I'll meanwhile be waiting for it. Just one thing, I'm not such a 1vs1 strat ME whore so just pick any other map.
And oh yeah, 16% weighted ?? Really ??"

Lol, you claim I'm only playing weak players to intentionally have decent looking stats.

I link to 6 games (on an account with only 11 games played total) of people better than you losing to me.

Yet, rather than acknowledge that you were wrong and making faulty assumptions you want to play a game, but not on the template all the games I linked were, as if you managing to win on some other template would somehow prove that I am intentionally playing piss-poor players to pad my stats as you claimed.

Stay classy Aranka, stay classy.

@JV

I wouldn't be disappointed in the loss against Summer were I you. She's a much better than average player, and used to be top 20 on the 1v1 ladder, {wwd}gg however I fully expect you can beat - easily. He not only has less than 30% 1v1, 2v2, and 3v3, but also has a nearly 20% boot-rate, certainly not the type of teammate I'd want, and as such not the type of person I'd want to be in a clan with.

This guy is Gui.

@ Lotus.

I link to 6 games (on an account with only 11 games played total) of people better than you losing to me.

Think before you speak love, I'm proof that your statment is shit. Just because I can beat a player way out of my league and yet lose to one still way out of my league, doesn't mean the player who lost to me can't consistantly beat the player that won.

This happened... Both players appear in this thread too c:


So shut the hell up, and play a game. Or three.

black lotus, your despicable comment shows makes me think you're arrogant and boastful. Can i challenge you to a 1v1 Strategic?

@Naomi.

You think before you speak.

Your post is complete nonsense.

I never stated Aranka could "never" beat me. (Which seems to be what you're implying, that even though I can beat people better than her she could still beat me - that's a given, people quite frequently beat people better at the game than themselves, I can probably find 20 example of it on the ladder from games this week.

However I think based on 6 of my 10 wins being against people 60% or better at 1v1, that it's clear I'm not doing what she accused me of - the only games this account has played against genuinely bad players were cases where I was in the lobby and they joined, in such circumstances I have no control over who joins.

Change 6 out of 10 to 7 out of 11:

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=4260532 - another 60% 1v1 bites the dust.

i'v beaten dom before as well. i assume you accept my challenge. i'll send a game

Damn, still 7 out of 11, Falcon doesn't have a high enough 1v1% to be listed :( Does his 1v1 rating being 200 higher than yours qualify him as your superior Aranka?

The match against {wwd}gg is just about over...Just waiting for him to surrender. We are starting up a 2nd one too. GL next game.

And to clarify this is my only account. No alt Trolling for me. :)

my 1v1 69% average sit down mother trucker.

black lotus, your despicable comment shows makes me think you're arrogant and boastful. Can i challenge you to a 1v1 Strategic?

Oh the irony,so sweet so sweet.Cough*Hypocrite*cough

Damn, still 7 out of 11, Falcon doesn't have a high enough 1v1% to be listed :( Does his 1v1 rating being 200 higher than yours qualify him as your superior Aranka?

Hardly...but if that is your criteria then go for it.

Personally I'm more of a team player who enjoys playing various maps. People already know how I feel about the standard 1vs1 template.

Look at tournies in which they change the maps every match and/or try uncommon maps...in those I think I belong to the top tier players (top 4 on average in tournies)

Who cares about 1v1 win%? I could win like %90 of mine if I just did auto games and bad open tournaments. It isn't hard to pad stats if you really want to.

Exactly ^ ;)

I highly doubt you'd win 90% of autogames unless you specifically went out of your way to avoid joining games with opponents over 50% 1v1.

You're 3-10 against people over 1800 rating and 4-16 vs. people over 1700.

You'd get at least 1 in 10 opponents who either has over a 1700 rating, or would be capable of having a rating that high if they were a member, and even against lower rated opponents you have lost another 33 games.

49 ladder losses in 113 games, 57% winrate, or 65% vs people under 1700 rating.

You'd need to be at least 80% vs. the under 1700 crowd to come close to 90% on autogames unless hand-picking your games I reckon. That'd require being about one and a half times as good as you currently are (80% loses 20 out of 100, you lose 35, nearly twice as many, I'd consider someone with 80% 1v1 to be 58% better than someone with 65% assuming they played the same people).

Well, you are assuming I have gotten no better than when I joined the ladder for the first time. In my last 50 games I am winning %62 of them.

And most players in auto games are worse than even bad ladder players.

Anyway, it doesn't matter. My point remains that win% can be padded.

chris is right, he could easily get 90-95% win rate in auto games

iron you behave like an arrogant child yourself, shut up and sit down

wait... you are an arrogant child. forget it