{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 02:52:42 |
{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
|
and this is also one of our biggest problems, none of our players are bad, so we don't h ave any members to make round robins. i haven't hheard from joe the destroyer yet, so it would be hard to orangize tis 1v1 round robin, agressive
|
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 02:55:10 |
{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
|
i dont think agressive and quick are same people, quick came from REGL and agressive came from VIW, i'm not saying its not possible to have accounts in diffrenet clans, but i think thats unlikely,
sorry for the triple post :P
|
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 03:52:06 |
awesomely bitchtastic beta 2.o
Level 58
Report
|
NIKE nO triple posting you gonna bring the grammar police back to this thread
|
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 13:50:27 |
Richard Sharpe
Level 59
Report
|
Nike... while I am certain it wasn't your intent but I am quite amused by how your phrasing makes it appear that all members are bad.
"none of our players are bad, so we don't h ave any members"
If you the reason you have no members is because you only have good players then therefore it implies that all members are bad players. Obviously something is simply lost in translation but I still found it amusing nonetheless.
|
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 14:19:48 |
{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
|
i no longer wonder why agressive complain about "grammer police" on warlight. -.-'
|
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 14:22:04 |
Richard Sharpe
Level 59
Report
|
If you consider that to be grammar policing then I think you misunderstand the concept...
|
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 14:37:27 |
{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
|
then what is the concept of grammer policing?
|
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 14:41:47 |
Richard Sharpe
Level 59
Report
|
Criticizing/correcting the misuse of grammar. Your grammar was fine, it was your meaning that was the issue. Grammar policing would be attacking misplaced commas or missing capitalization.
As I said above, I am sure it was unintentional but the way you phrased that made it appear that your meaning was that the clan lacks members because only good players are allowed in. The fact is that the two are completely unrelated... having a clan full of good players has absolutely zero bearing on the number of members in the clan. I am well aware of that fact and I am sure you are as well.
|
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 14:47:33 |
{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
|
Alright. I take back my comment.
I'm not sure if you agree, but 99% of disagreements in the forums don't get agreed on in the end. My observation is many players here have massive egos.
|
{RSP} Internal 1v1's: 8/3/2012 15:12:30 |
Richard Sharpe
Level 59
Report
|
Nike, I'd say that is generally true in life as a whole and not simply relegated to these forums or the internet. The only time disagreements are settled amicably, in life or the internet, is when there is an existing mutual respect.
|