I understand how capitalism works, thing is that here we are talking about overdone capitalism. Something that can be done for the sake of the issue is this: Fizzer can let everyone adjust luck, but make the basic number of armies available to members only. Don't underestimate this setting, it really is crucial. The only difference is that luck favours lucky people, while a wise decision about the basic number of armies favours mathematical brains and/or skilled players. All in all, there is a solution to everything, provided that someone wants to find it. Now if you still think I am being unfair on Fizzer, I have nothing more to say. I 'll just refuse to understand you.

Funny bit is that I went out of my way to be nice to you and you dismiss it summarily and turn around and say I am 'too small for you' and that you 'will step on me if we pass in the street'.

That right there is comedy gold! Have fun playing the steady, predictable AI and railing against random luck that magically always works against you.

Thanks for the advice, Richard, but it came a bit late. Sorry. In fact, predictability isn't something I really look into. My defensive tactics can face any player, once the settings allow for an even match. So, no matter where I concede an attack, I 've been prepared for that. The only thing I can't counter in any way is cheating. This is why I don't play MP games, along with the fact that I can't affect luck. Who tells me that I am not playing against someone having access to the game server? I just don't trust people enough to risk to lose due to someone cheating or being just lucky. And if there has been one person here trying to be nice, it's me. I could have behaved much worse, regarding *some* replies I 've received in the past few days. The only reason I am still posting is because I want to solve this argument, basically because this is what my personality tells me to do. Now if you don't appreciate my tries, then I am right to call you a small person. In this case, I might step on you by mistake. I do never step on others on purpose xD

Man, you really are afraid to lose, huh? Thats just sad. I get the feeling that no matter how you lost you would blame it on luck and not ability or skill.

What nationality if I may ask? Completely randomly, my money is on Finnish.

"My defensive tactics can face any player, once the settings allow for an even match. So, no matter where I concede an attack, I 've been prepared for that."

tell me a template in which case your defensive tactics will be honed to perfectly, I will create it, you can verify it, then I can best you, and I am far from the best player, of the non-cheating players, but purely the mathematical players..

most players consider anything they don't *understand* as cheating, which appears to be the case with you.


If you will not prove your worth by providing said template, please do not respond, I don't have time for people that can talk, but fail to back up those words.

Don't bother Perrin. She speaks constantly of her desire for a 0-luck game... I offered her that very thing, going so far as to offer the exact setup of her choice and my immediate surrender to allow for an AI-only game. No dice.

She wants to complain, thats all there is to it.

@ Richard Sharpe and Perrin: You both think that everyone on here is very stupid. You only put yourselves outside that "rule". In an angelic world, I 'd most probably have not complained about anything. I am not afraid to lose, provided that this loss is in an even game. I am afraid to lose to cheaters and/or lucky people. And yes, I do not understand why I attack with 40 armies and can't kill 15, but that's not a cheat. It's just the too high luck factor. Now as for your guess for my nationality, Richard, you missed. Is anyone else willing to guess? (To be honest, I really hope everyone misses. You 've turned me into a very bad person with all that hate. Fuck you, suckers.)

by my own words I put myself below many players on here.
I don't think everyone on here is stupid.. I'm not sure entirely how you came to that conclusion.. at best I think *you* are stupid

40*.6=24 avg armies killed
24-(24*0.75)= 6, minimum armies killed on standard luck
24+(16*0.75)= 36, maximum armies killed on standard luck

that means that 40 can attack as low as 7 and not kill them all.. which might not be entirely accurate all the time.. although the spartans have proven that it *is* realistically feasible.

"I am not afraid to lose, provided that this loss is in an even game."

provide me with the details of what you deem to be an even game, and then we will play, me as a self acclaimed mediocore player.. you as the best on the site, and see how you actually stack up..
Your stout refusal time and again to play in an *even* game, just shouts your fear and ineptitude.

I'll even post the game here as soon as it's started, so w/l/d, everyone here can vouch for whether or not there was any cheating done.

As a general rule, I don't hate anyone. Ever. I'm just amused by all the garbage and hatred you are spewing (yes, saying 'FUCK the USA' qualifies as hate...)

Perrin, you misunderstood me once again. When I said I am the best member of this community, I meant the best in terms of character. Sure I easily get angry and, being strict, I look bad, but behave well to me and I 'll never ever pick on you. I was very good with you until you started picking on me for no obvious reason. I know about the ancient Spartans, but when I came to Warlight I never expected a simulation of that thing always working against me. Are you sure you want to know the settings I like? OK then, look at these two examples: Attack kill rate 2%, defence kill rate 98%. Keep in mind that I just gave you two examples. I wonder how each of us will stack up in such a slow-paced game... You will get bored and surrender, or at least vote to end. But I am not the kind of person to enjoy frustrating others, unlike what you seem to be. If you hadn't picked on me first, we 'd be friends now. Same goes with Richard. He picked on me at about the same time you did, without me having done something wrong with any of you or anyone else. I suppose that my only real mistake is that I made Vostro feel special, and this was just because I couldn't be sure about the right way to avoid that. Then Vostro created that duplicate account (well, 99,6% of the odds are his, to be exact) and all this fuss started. I 've tried to end it during the past two days, but neither of you is helping. In fact you are both still picking on me. This is not my idea of a good person, so no matter if you win, draw or lose that fucked even game, Mr. Perrin, you are a person of lower quality than me and can't claim the opposite. I have no other solution than to give up. Facts have spoken, you didn't listen to them, who tells me that you 'll listen now? Nobody. And yes, Richard, I do hate the USA and have many serious reasons for that. I don't hate just to hate. But you definitely are not interested in these reasons, so I can say goodbye from now. Don't expect anything more from me, I am done over here and, strangely, am glad to say that.

"When I said I am the best member of this community, I meant the best in terms of character."

After all, everyone knows that being racist is an excellent personality trait! All the best people in the world are racists! Duh.