Was colonialism better for Africa?
Lol hell no it wasn't. Why such a misleading title?
So, do you think colonialism is preferable to the current situation? I am inclined to say so. If we could have colonialism with moderate human rights, I am sure it would be better than the AIDS/Ebola infested, mud-drinking hell-hole Africa is now. What about you?
Now the actual question instead of just the clickbait. I am not positive that many countries would WANT to help out Africa that much. It could so easily lead to more exploitation of the native people and resources. Just because countries are colonising again doesn't mean that AIDS and Ebola will suddenly disappear... They would've happened regardless. Also, who gets what? There will be squabbles / fights over that. It's waaay too risky to consider imo.